Can I get the specifications changed?

Be very careful about what you wish for. Part of the reason for the success of RSS is that it is a very simple but also stable specification. However, it’s not completely static and there are initiatives to evolve it and move it forward.

The main forums for discussion and evolution of the specifications are:-

  • YahooGroups Syndication List The main meeting place for developers.
  • YahooGroups ReallySimpleSyndication List A Userland initiative to create an 0.93 spec.
  • YahooGroups RSS 1.0 development List The RSS 1.0 RDF development group.
  • Acronyms – What does RSS mean?

    According to UserLand, “There is no consensus on what RSS stands for, so it’s not an acronym, it’s a name.” I’ve seen the following:-

  • Really Simple Syndication
  • Rich Site Summary
  • R(DF) Site Summary
  • Rich Site Syndication
  • Rich Syndication Standard
    And no doubt many others. I like the first of these, but the others have merit too.

    Since the split in the community between the 0.9 development and the 1.0 development, there has been talk of giving new names for each fork but retaining RSS for 0.91 and earlier. But there hasn’t been consensus on this, so for the moment, everyone continues to use “RSS” for all of it.